Blue Pages

January 2, 2005

source: NYT
Recast the Hardware? Easy. Now Try the Mind-Set.

Published: January 2, 2005

Linda S. Sanford, IBM senior vice president in charge of the company’s efforts at transformation

Q. Were there really disagreements within I.B.M.? Doesn’t the company have a very cohesive culture?

A. We have a whole different composition of people than we once had. We have 320,000 employees spread across 170-plus countries. About 40 percent don’t come to the office every day. They either work in a client’s office or they work at home or they’re mobile. And 50 percent of us have been with I.B.M. for less than five years.

Q. What have you done to link people together within I.B.M.?

A. We have created a very extensive database that includes a profile of all the employees across the corporation. It’s much more than just name, rank and serial number. It gets into a person’s prior work history, papers they have written, patents they have received, customers they have worked with and competitors they know. It’s powered by a very good search engine.

So I, as an employee, may be in a customer meeting and I may need expertise; I can go onto the intranet and search by key words. If I need someone with financial services expertise located in France, for example, I just type in three or four key words, hit the search button and I get back a list of all the experts across the I.B.M. company. It also will give me all methods of contacting them, including phone number, cellphone, e-mail address and their instant messaging. It will signal whether they are online, so I can quickly send them an instant message.

and on transformation…

Q. Why are companies pushing so hard to transform themselves?

A. Going for growth is a very big piece of this. About a year ago, we published an extensive study we did on 450 chief executive officers from around the world, representing multiple industries. It showed that the top item on the C.E.O. agenda is growth. Most of those C.E.O.’s felt that growth was going to come from innovation. Therefore, creating a climate or environment inside their businesses that stimulated, encouraged and rewarded innovation was really critical.

Q. What resistance is there inside I.B.M. to continuous change?

A. The framework that we use has three dimensions. The first focuses on our business processes – what we do and how we do it. We step back and take a look at whether those processes need to better reflect the marketplace. That could involve eliminating some steps or automating them or just completely doing them in a different way. Another element is technology as an enabler of those process changes to make us more flexible and responsive.

The third is culture, meaning the people side of the business. Quite honestly, that is the most difficult. It affects the rate and pace at which any company transforms itself. When I spend time with clients, sharing ideas about transformation, we spend 90 percent of our time on culture change.

Q. How are you trying to transform I.B.M.’s culture?

A. Our customers are looking for integrated solutions rather than just buying pieces – a piece of hardware, a piece of software and a piece of services. They want solutions to business problems they’re trying to solve. By definition, that requires I.B.M.’ers across various business units to work together, to cross the boundaries of their business units, to emerge from their silos, if you will, to bring themselves together to bring an integrated solution to the client. It’s all about collaborating.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: